Governments urged to ‘bite the bullet’ to meet net-zero 2050 targets

I show You how To Make Huge Profits In A Short Time With Cryptos!

THE International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), working with the governments of The Bahamas and Liberia, has presented a comprehensive proposal to ensure delivery of the UN International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) target to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from international shipping by 2050.

At the heart of the proposal is a GHG fee, charged to ships per tonne of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emitted, combined with a “feebate” mechanism to incentivize the accelerated production and uptake of zero/near-zero GHG marine fuels, such as green ammonia, hydrogen and methanol, sustainable biofuels, and new technologies such as on-board carbon capture.

While the principal purpose of the proposed maritime GHG pricing mechanism is to narrow the significant cost gap with conventional marine fuels, around $2.5 billion per year would also be allocated to an “IMO Net Zero Shipping Fund” to support maritime GHG reduction efforts in developing countries. The fund is to help ensure that shipping’s transition to net zero will be truly global and that green fuels will be available in all ports worldwide.

ICS Secretary General Guy Platten. PHOTO FROM ICS

ICS takes no view on the quantum of what the GHG Fee should be, which would depend on the reward rate agreed upon per tonne of GHG emissions prevented by the use, by ships, of zero/near-zero GHG energy sources. But if, for the first five years of implementation, IMO sets the reward rate at about $100 per tonne of CO2e prevented (including upstream emissions), the proposal suggests that a GHG fee initially equivalent to about $60 per tonne of conventional fuel oil consumed by ships could be sufficient to achieve the purposes of the measure.

Get the latest news


delivered to your inbox

Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters

By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

The proposed IMO “mechanism” aims to accelerate the production and uptake of new green marine fuels by reducing their cost disadvantage, with feebates (rewards) being disbursed to ships for the CO2e emissions prevented by not using conventional fuel oil

GHG fees will be collected and feebates disbursed via a web-based automated IMO “mechanism,” the prototype for which ICS has already developed and submitted to IMO.

From the revenue generated from the GHG fee, an amount equivalent to 20 percent of the income allocated to support the feebate program will be transferred annually to the newly proposed IMO 2 Net Zero Shipping Fund, with this proportion subject to adjustment within five years of entry to force.

“A GHG pricing mechanism using a flat rate GHG fee and a feebate element will be vital to the rapid development and uptake of green marine fuels. To incentivize the production and use of green marine fuels, our proposal includes a carefully thought out feebate mechanism, which is fuel neutral, to incentivize the prevention of up to 100 million tonnes of GHG emissions per year during the first five years,” ICS Secretary General Guy Platten said:”This will help de-risk investment decisions and enable shipping to rapidly reach a ‘take-off’ point in the use of green marine fuels, something which is needed urgently as their current availability is virtually zero,” he added.

“It is time for governments to ‘bite the bullet.’ Unless a distinct GHG pricing mechanism and feebate program are included in the IMO regulations adopted next year, we genuinely fear that shipping’s transition to net zero by or around 2050 will unlikely succeed,” Platten said.

In addition to the implications for the achievement of United Nations climate change goals, any failure to agree on a flat rate GHG Fee applicable to all ships globally would also lead to a proliferation of piecemeal, unilateral GHG charges being applied to shipping worldwide — regionally and nationally — with regulatory chaos, economic inefficiency, the risk of supply shocks and disruption to seaborne trade, and damage to IMO’s authority as shipping’s global regulator.

In the view of ICS, a maritime GHG emission pricing mechanism means “all ships should contribute GHG fees equally based on their actual GHG emissions, consistent with fair competition and the ‘polluter pays’ principle.”

The proposal will be discussed at the next round of IMO negotiations, which resume in London on Sept. 23, 2024 to develop a new package of midterm GHG reduction regulations for international shipping for adoption by governments in 2025.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*