THE Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a man for raping his minor daughter, affirming that child abuse cases can proceed in court even when the victims are unable to testify.
The ruling aligns with the doctrine of “unavailable child” as stipulated under the Rule on Examination of a Child Witness.
In a decision written by Associate Justice Mario Lopez, the court’s Second Division confirmed the Regional Trial Court’s (RTC) ruling decision in a case that highlights significant legal protections for child victims of abuse.
The case originated from a report on May 25, 2018, when the 14-year-old victim disclosed to her aunt that her father had been abusing her since she was 10 years old.
The aunt assisted the girl in filing a complaint against the father.
During the investigation, the victim provided a sworn statement to the police detailing the abuse, which included a sexually explicit account of recent incidents.
A medical examination corroborated the abuse, revealing deep-healed hymenal lacerations, indicative of sexual violence.
The victim was not present to testify during the court proceedings because her mother had sent her away.
In lieu of her direct testimony, the prosecution presented the victim’s sworn statement and her completed Sexual Abuse Protocol, along with testimonies from relatives and the medico-legal report.
Challenging the RTC’s decision, the accused argued that the absence of the victim’s testimony rendered the evidence inadmissible, claiming it amounted to hearsay. The Court of Appeals, however, upheld the RTC’s ruling, and the accused brought the case to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s ruling clarified that under Section 28 of the Rule on Examination of a Child Witness, hearsay testimony from a child is permissible when the child is unavailable for legitimate reasons—whether due to the risk of psychological injury, lack of memory, or the inability to attend.
The provision ensures that legal proceedings can continue without compromising the rights of vulnerable victims.
In this particular case, the Court found that the victim’s testimony to be reliable, supported by substantial evidence, and underscored the necessity to prevent further trauma to victims of child abuse.
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of enabling justice to be served, even in the absence of direct testimony from the victim, noting that it can be critical to ensure that such cases are effectively pursued.
The Supreme Court confirmed the RTC’s verdict, sentencing the perpetrator to reclusion perpetua, or 30 years in prison, and ordering him to pay the victim P450,000 as compensation.
Be the first to comment